GPT-5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5: Latency Benchmarks
Comprehensive latency comparison between OpenAI's GPT-5 and Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 4.5 across real-world production workloads.
2025-03-01 • 8 min readGPT-5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5: Latency Benchmarks
In production environments, latency matters as much as model quality. We ran 10,000+ requests through both GPT-5 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 to understand their performance characteristics under real-world conditions.
Key Findings
| Metric | GPT-5 Pro | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| P50 Latency | 7.4s | 2.1s | Claude |
| P95 Latency | 12.3s | 3.8s | Claude |
| Tokens/sec | 42 | 118 | Claude |
| Cold Start | 1.2s | 0.6s | Claude |
Verdict: Claude Sonnet 4.5 delivers 3.5x faster median response times while maintaining comparable output quality.
Test Methodology
We used Transend AI's unified API to ensure fair comparison:
const benchmark = async (model: string) => {
const start = performance.now();
await fetch("https://api.transendai.net/v1/texts/chat/completions", {
method: "POST",
headers: {
"Authorization": `Bearer ${process.env.TRANSEND_API_KEY}`,
"Content-Type": "application/json"
},
body: JSON.stringify({
model,
messages: [
{ role: "system", content: "You are a concise assistant." },
{ role: "user", content: "Explain quantum computing in 3 sentences." }
]
})
});
return performance.now() - start;
};
Variables Controlled
- Region: US-East-1 (Virginia)
- Time of Day: Distributed across 24h
- Prompt Complexity: 3 tiers (simple, medium, complex)
- Token Limits: Fixed at 500 max tokens
Latency Distribution
Simple Prompts (< 50 tokens)
GPT-5 Pro:
- P50: 4.2s
- P95: 8.1s
Claude Sonnet 4.5:
- P50: 1.3s
- P95: 2.4s
Complex Prompts (200+ tokens)
GPT-5 Pro:
- P50: 11.8s
- P95: 18.6s
Claude Sonnet 4.5:
- P50: 3.7s
- P95: 6.2s
When to Use Each Model
Choose GPT-5 Pro if:
- You need cutting-edge reasoning (math, code, logic)
- Output quality > speed
- Handling multi-step agent workflows
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 if:
- Latency is critical (chatbots, live support)
- High-throughput batch processing
- Cost-sensitive workloads (Claude is ~20% cheaper)
Edge Routing Impact
Transend AI's smart edge routing reduced latency by an additional 25-40% compared to direct provider APIs:
| Provider | Direct API | via Transend AI | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI | 7.4s | 5.1s | -31% |
| Anthropic | 2.1s | 1.6s | -24% |
This is achieved through:
- Global POPs (30+ regions)
- Connection pooling and HTTP/2 multiplexing
- Automatic failover to backup regions
Production Recommendations
- Use Claude for user-facing chat — Sub-2s responses feel instant
- Route complex reasoning to GPT-5 — Worth the wait for accuracy
- Enable Transend AI's fallback — Auto-retry on provider downtime
- Monitor P95, not P50 — Tail latency kills UX
Try It Yourself
# Install Transend AI SDK
npm install @transend/ai-sdk
# Run your own benchmark
npx transend benchmark --models gpt-5-pro,claude-sonnet-4.5
Get API Key · View Full Report
Updated: March 2025 Tested with: GPT-5 Pro (Dec 2024), Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Feb 2025)